✨ NEW GAME!

The immersive adventure that makes words stick (because the story depends on them).

PLAY FREE ➔
Cart
 

You have been redirected to United States

255px US flag

Would you like to shop the US store?

Cart

Add items to your cart to receive free shipping.
Sad character with empty gift box and single sock.

Your Cart is empty!

You might also like:

Mrs Wordsmith: Suitability with ADHD and Neurodivergent Learners

Why Our Products Work for Many ADHD and Neurodivergent Learners — and Why We're Careful About How We Say It

Written by: Mrs Wordsmith

|

Published on

|

Time to read 4 min

A parent messaged us recently to say that after months of dreading reading practice with her ADHD son, she'd found something that held his attention for twenty minutes straight. That thing was Word Tag, our vocabulary gaming app.


This isn't an isolated message. We hear from parents of children with ADHD, dyslexia, autism, and other learning differences. They aren't the audience we originally imagined. But they're telling us something important, and we want to take it seriously.


We don't make specialist SEND tools, and we'd never claim to. But when we look at what we know about how neurodivergent learners process information — as well as how our products are actually designed — a picture starts to emerge.

What neurodivergent learners often need

The research here is genuinely interesting [1, 2, 3, 4]. Neurodivergent children with ADHD, autism, dyslexia, and related differences don't share a single learning profile — but there are common themes in what tends to work. Let's take them one at a time.

Short-burst, high-dosage learning
Visual anchors and distinctive imagery

Short-burst, high-dosage learning. Sustained focus is hard when attention regulation is a challenge. Short, frequent sessions — rather than long blocks — tend to produce better outcomes for many ADHD learners [1].


Visual anchors and distinctive imagery. Striking, distinctive visuals reduce cognitive load and give the brain something to "hang" new words on. Pairing an image with a word produces stronger recall than the word alone — the basis of dual-coding theory [2].

Repetition without boredom
Progress and agency

Repetition without boredom. Spaced repetition — re-exposing learners to content at carefully timed intervals — is one of the most reliable ways to improve retention. But for learners who disengage quickly, the repetition has to feel fresh, not like a chore [3].


Progress and agency. A sense of achievement matters enormously, especially for a child who has experienced repeated frustration. Game mechanics — levels, streaks, mastery signals — provide the small, frequent rewards that sustain engagement and motivation [4].

What our products actually do

We don't design our products simply to be funny. There's a lot of scientific research that sits behind every decision we make, from the way we structure our video games to the way in which we approach phonics instruction. Here's how that shows up in three of our best-known products.

Word Tag

Word Tag adapts its pacing automatically, which means a child can work at exactly their own level without that being visible to classmates — a quiet dignity that matters enormously when a neurodivergent child has already experienced self-consciousness around learning. The game format sustains attention where a worksheet wouldn't, and the built-in spaced repetition means each word comes back at the right moment for consolidation, without the child having to manage that themselves.

Storyteller's Word a Day

Our signature illustration style is deliberately bold, funny, and strange — which isn't just an aesthetic choice. Distinctive imagery creates stronger memory traces. A ridiculous cartoon helps a child remember "exasperated" in a way a dictionary definition never could. The short-burst format — one word a day, one spread at a time — also suits neurodivergent attention profiles that struggle with longer reading sessions.

Readiculous Readers

Although the stories in our phonics readers change book to book, the pedagogical structure each set follows is highly predictable. Each book focuses on a target sound (or set of sounds), which a reader will spot whenever they appear. That's 12 books, 12 target sounds, and 12 silly stories. For dyslexic learners especially, that systematic consistency is exactly what the evidence recommends.

What parents tell us

We'd rather show you than tell you. These are real customers describing their own kids, in their own words — pulled from our public reviews, not paraphrased.


"My son has been talking about nothing but this book since we got it. He's autistic, 23 years old, and has never quite understood neurotypical people's feelings. But we've noticed he's been putting what he's learned into practice — showing compassion, being sociable, being considerate. Things we've been trying to teach him for a long time, this book has helped him take on board." — from a customer review of The Book of Big Feelings


"It was awesome. I teach Dyslexia and we use it as a filler when there is extra time. My students loved it. Very much like UNO which they love." — a teacher, in a review of our games for dyslexia groups


"Not every child learns the same way and that's not a problem to fix. For many children with autism, visual learning is a superpower." — Lauren Clephane, verified Trustpilot review, July 2026, on 37 Essential House Rules

Final thoughts

What we can say is this: our products are built on design principles — short-burst learning, visual distinctiveness, spaced repetition, adaptive pacing, predictable structure — that happen to align with what researchers and educators know about neurodivergent learning. That's not a marketing claim. It's an observation, and one we want to be careful and honest about.


If our products are working for your neurodivergent child in ways you didn't expect, we'd love to know. That kind of feedback shapes everything we build next.

References

[1] Barkley, R. A. (2015). Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

[2] Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287. (The foundational "dual coding" theory — visuals + words = stronger recall)

[3] Cepeda, N. J., et al. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1095–1102.

[4] Luman, M., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2005). The impact of reinforcement contingencies on AD/HD: A review and theoretical appraisal. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(2), 183–213.